What Is Scope 3? Understanding Indirect Emissions and Their Regulatory Impact


Cut through the green tape
We don't push agendas. At Net Zero Compare, we cut through the hype and fear to deliver the straightforward facts you need for making informed decisions on green products and services. Whether motivated by compliance, customer demands, or a real passion for the environment, you’re welcome here. We provide reliable information—why you seek it is not our concern.
Until recently, Scope 3 emissions were often seen as a distant or optional part of carbon accounting. Only a handful of companies actively measured them, given the complexity involved. That is changing. Scope 3 is now an important part of emerging climate disclosure frameworks. Several jurisdictions already require reporting, and many others are moving in that direction. As regulations tighten and supply chain expectations grow, most companies will eventually need to address their full value chain emissions.
What Is Scope 3?
Scope 3 refers to indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that occur outside an organization’s direct control, but across its value chain. It is one of the three emission scopes defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, a widely used framework for carbon accounting.
What Does Scope 3 Cover?
Upstream Activities (before goods or services reach the company):
Purchased goods and services
Capital goods
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or 2
Upstream transportation and distribution
Waste generated in operations
Business travel
Employee commuting
Upstream leased assets
Downstream Activities (after the company sells its products or services):
Downstream transportation and distribution
Processing of sold products
Use of sold products
End-of-life treatment of sold products
Downstream leased assets
Franchises
Investments
How Scope 3 Differs from Scope 1 and 2
Scope 1 refers to direct emissions from sources owned or controlled by the company, such as fuel combustion and company vehicles.
Scope 2 includes indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, steam, heating, and cooling.
Scope 3 covers all other indirect emissions that occur throughout the full value chain.
In many industries, Scope 3 accounts for the largest share of emissions, often exceeding 70% of a company’s total carbon footprint.
Why Scope 3 Matters
Scale: Scope 3 often represents the majority of emissions.
Transparency: Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting and investor demands increasingly focus on full emissions disclosure.
Responsibility: Reducing Scope 3 requires cooperation with suppliers, logistics partners, and even customers. Companies that ignore Scope 3 risk providing an incomplete picture of their climate impact.
Where Is Scope 3 Reporting Mandatory?
Scope 3 reporting is already required in several jurisdictions, and momentum is building globally. It is now mandatory in the EU, California, and is being introduced in Australia. Other countries encourage or require it under specific conditions, particularly when emissions are deemed material. The table below summarizes the current regulatory landscape:
Region | Is Scope 3 Mandatory? | Notes |
---|---|---|
EU | Yes | Required under CSRD for large companies beginning in 2024 (public) and 2025 (others) |
UK | Encouraged or based on materiality | Scope 1 and 2 are mandatory; Scope 3 required if material and must be disclosed under SECR for listed companies |
Canada | Not yet (delayed) | Reporting paused; federal rules expected by 2028 under Canadian Sustainability Standards Board |
Australia | Phased in starting 2025 | Reporting begins voluntarily in 2025 for large entities; mandatory Scope 3 expected from 2026 under Treasury reforms |
USA (Federal) | No | SEC finalized rules in 2024 that exclude Scope 3; voluntary disclosure still encouraged |
USA (California) | Yes | SB 253 and SB 261 require Scope 3 disclosure for public and private companies with over $1 billion in revenue, starting 2026 |
Others | Encouraged or sector-specific | New Zealand, Japan, and South Korea have voluntary or industry-specific guidance for Scope 3 reporting |
What Are the Penalties for Non-Compliance?
Failure to report Scope 3 emissions can lead to financial penalties, operational consequences, and in some countries, even criminal charges. Below is an overview by region:
Region | Financial Penalty | Criminal Penalty | Other Consequences |
---|---|---|---|
France | Up to €75,000; €30,000 for audit noncompliance (Code de l’environnement) | Up to 5 years in prison | Penalties for obstructing mandatory disclosures or verification |
Germany | Up to €10 million, 5% of annual turnover, or twice the profits gained (LkSG) | None | Applies under the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act |
Italy | €20,000 to €150,000 (Legislative Decree 254/2016) | None | Enforcement varies by regional authority |
Ireland | €5,000 plus up to 6 months imprisonment | Up to 6 months | Applies under Companies Act obligations for non-financial reporting |
Other EU | Varies (from thousands to millions depending on national law) | Jail possible in some cases | Can include formal warnings, compliance orders, and publication |
California | $500,000 per year (SB 253); $50,000 per year (SB 261) | No criminal penalty | Safe harbor until 2030 for Scope 3 if progress is demonstrated |
Other US | Up to $50,000 or more, depending on violations and frequency | None | May affect ESG scores, state contracts, or investor trust |
Key Takeaways:
Fines can range from thousands to several million euros or dollars per year.
Criminal penalties apply in certain EU countries.
Companies may be barred from tenders or face increased scrutiny from investors.
Even in regions with safe harbor periods, companies are expected to show real progress or risk losing those protections.
Conclusion
Scope 3 emissions are no longer a secondary concern. With regulatory frameworks tightening and stakeholder expectations rising, organizations must develop robust strategies to understand and address these indirect emissions. What was once considered optional is now a critical part of credible climate disclosure.
Ignoring Scope 3 may save effort in the short term but can lead to financial and reputational consequences in the long term. Taking action now is not only a matter of compliance but also of maintaining trust and market relevance.

More related content

The EU's Omnibus Proposal: A Deep Dive

Carbon Accounting vs. Climate Risk Management - What's the Difference

Industry Classification Systems used in the Green Economy
