Net Zero Compare
Recycled Claim Standard

Recycled Claim Standard: Verifies recycled material content and chain of custody across supply chains

Maílis Carrilho
Written by Maílis Carrilho
Updated on September 6th, 2026

Summary

The Recycled Claim Standard, or RCS, is a voluntary global standard owned and managed by Textile Exchange. It verifies recycled input and tracks recycled raw materials through the supply chain using third-party certification and chain-of-custody controls. RCS is narrower than the Global Recycled Standard because it does not address chemical, social or environmental production requirements beyond recycled material integrity. It is voluntary unless required by brands, retailers, procurement, contracts or sourcing policies. RCS does not replace waste, chemical, product safety, labeling or green claims laws, but it supports credible recycled content claims.

Details

Jurisdictions
  • Global
Mandatory for

RCS is not legally mandatory.

It can become practically required where:

A brand requires RCS-certified recycled material.
A retailer requires chain-of-custody evidence.
A buyer contract references RCS.
A public procurement process requires verified recycled content.
A product claim requires certification evidence.
A sourcing policy requires Textile Exchange certification.

Voluntary for

In most cases, RCS is voluntary and used to substantiate recycled material claims.

Deep dive

4 min read
Updated Sep 6, 2026

📩 Stay ahead of climate regulation and reporting shifts

Regulatory updates, reporting standards, and new climate software — distilled into one concise weekly brief for decision-makers.

Thanks for signing up. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Practical updates. Once per week.


What’s Required

1. Verification of recycled input

RCS sets requirements for third-party certification of recycled input and chain of custody. The standard is designed to verify and track recycled raw materials through the supply chain.

Organizations may need to document:

  • Recycled input material.

  • Reclaimed material source.

  • Pre-consumer or post-consumer status.

  • Supplier certification.

  • Material volumes.

  • Product composition.

  • Transaction certificates.

  • Chain-of-custody controls.

2. Chain of custody

RCS relies on chain-of-custody certification to track certified recycled materials from input through processing and sale. Textile Exchange states that RCS and GRS set criteria for third-party certification of recycled materials and chain of custody.

Companies may need:

  • Certified site scope.

  • Supplier records.

  • Input and output reconciliation.

  • Segregation or controlled blending processes.

  • Transaction documentation.

  • Product claim controls.

  • Certification body audit evidence.

3. Scope of claims

RCS supports claims about recycled material content. It does not verify broader sustainability attributes such as chemical management, worker conditions, or environmental production practices. Textile Exchange specifically states that RCS does not address chemicals or social and environmental aspects of production beyond the integrity of recycled material.

This makes RCS suitable when the key claim is:

  • Recycled input.

  • Recycled material traceability.

  • Chain of custody.

  • Recycled content support.

4. Difference from GRS

RCS is narrower than GRS. GRS includes recycled content and chain of custody plus additional social, environmental, and chemical requirements. RCS focuses on recycled material verification and tracking.

For NZC, this distinction is important because RCS should not be described as a full sustainability production standard.

5. Textile Exchange standards transition

Textile Exchange is transitioning several standards into its Materials Matter Standard system. Its standards pages explain that Textile Exchange’s chain-of-custody and traceability system documents a product’s path through production so companies can make verified product claims.

Companies should monitor updates to RCS, GRS, CCS, and Materials Matter transition guidance.

Important Deadlines

RCS is voluntary, so there is no universal legal deadline.

Important timing points:

  • Certification timing depends on site certification, supply-chain documentation, audit, and transaction certificate processes.

  • Textile Exchange has published current RCS materials and standard resources.

  • Textile Exchange is revising and transitioning parts of its standards system, including chain-of-custody tools and Materials Matter alignment.

  • Certified organizations should monitor transition notices, standard updates, and certification body requirements.

Current Status

RCS is active. Textile Exchange describes the Recycled Claim Standard as a chain-of-custody standard to verify and track recycled raw materials through the supply chain.

Current status:

  • Active voluntary global standard.

  • Owned and managed by Textile Exchange.

  • Focused on recycled material verification.

  • Covers chain of custody.

  • Does not include broader chemical, social, or environmental production requirements.

  • Used mainly in textiles and apparel, but relevant to recycled material claims in broader supply chains.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

RCS does not impose statutory penalties.

Possible consequences include:

1. Certification refusal

A site or product may fail certification if recycled input or chain-of-custody requirements are not met.

2. Loss of certified status

Certified organizations may lose certification if they do not resolve audit findings.

3. Rejected claims

Brands or buyers may reject recycled content claims without valid certificates or transaction documentation.

4. Contractual consequences

If RCS is required by sourcing agreements, procurement or buyer policies, failure may create commercial consequences.

5. Greenwashing risk

Unsupported recycled content claims can create reputational and legal risk under consumer protection or green claims rules.

Examples of Known Violations / Failure Modes

Typical failure modes include:

  • Claiming RCS certification without a valid certificate.

  • Making product-level claims when only a facility is certified.

  • Missing transaction certificates.

  • Double counting recycled input.

  • Mixing certified and non-certified material without proper controls.

  • Mislabeling pre-consumer or post-consumer recycled content.

  • Using inaccurate recycled content percentages.

  • Making broader environmental claims that RCS does not support.

  • Confusing RCS with GRS.

  • Not documenting reclaimed material origin.

  • Using an unaccredited or unrecognized certification body.

  • Making claims beyond certified scope.

Resources


Maílis Carrilho
Added by:
Maílis Carrilho
Sustainability Research Analyst
Maílis Carrilho is a Sustainability Research Analyst (Intern) at Net Zero Compare, contributing research and analysis on climate tech, carbon policies, and sustainable solutions. She supports the team in developing fact-based content and insights to help companies and readers navigate the evolving sustainability landscape.
Our principle

Cut through the green tape

We don't push agendas. At Net Zero Compare, we cut through the hype and fear to deliver the straightforward facts you need for making informed decisions on green products and services. Whether motivated by compliance, customer demands, or a real passion for the environment, you’re welcome here. We provide reliable information. Why you seek it is not our concern.

Added on Sep 8, 2026 by Maílis Carrilho · Updated on Sep 6, 2026