Net Zero Compare
EU Digital Product Passport

EU Digital Product Passport: Establishes product-level ESG data, circularity disclosure and traceability infrastructure for goods placed on the EU market

Maílis Carrilho
Written by Maílis Carrilho
Published Jun 22, 2026

Summary

The EU Digital Product Passport, or DPP, is a product-level data infrastructure introduced under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation. It is designed to make sustainability, circularity and compliance information available across value chains, affecting manufacturers, importers, distributors, suppliers, repairers, recyclers, customs authorities, market surveillance bodies and ESG software providers. The DPP is not only a transparency tool. It is becoming a market-access mechanism for regulated product groups sold in the EU.

Details

Jurisdictions
  • European Union
Mandatory for

The DPP will be mandatory for product groups covered by delegated acts under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation. Obligations will vary by sector and role. Manufacturers and importers will carry the strongest direct responsibility, while suppliers will face indirect contractual obligations to provide DPP-ready data.

Deep dive

5 min read
Updated Jun 23, 2026

📩 Stay ahead of climate regulation and reporting shifts

Regulatory updates, reporting standards, and new climate software — distilled into one concise weekly brief for decision-makers.

Thanks for signing up. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Practical updates. Once per week.


What’s Required

The EU Digital Product Passport should be understood as a digital compliance layer for the circular economy. Its legal basis is Regulation (EU) 2024/1781, the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation, which creates a framework for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products and introduces the DPP as a way to carry product information throughout the lifecycle.

The DPP will require companies to attach structured sustainability and compliance data to products, product models, batches or items, depending on the future product-specific rules. This data may include information on materials, components, repairability, durability, recycled content, substances of concern, carbon footprint, environmental performance, spare parts, dismantling, reuse, refurbishment and end-of-life treatment.

This is a major shift from document-based compliance to data-based compliance. Companies will need systems that can collect information from suppliers, validate it, maintain it over time and make it accessible to authorised users. For many sectors, this means connecting product lifecycle management, ERP, supplier management, compliance, ESG reporting and traceability systems.

The DPP will be implemented through product-specific delegated acts. This means not all products will face identical requirements at the same time. Priority sectors are expected to include areas such as batteries, textiles, electronics, construction products, tyres and other high-impact value chains. CIRPASS, an EU-supported project, prepared DPP deployment roadmaps for electronics, batteries and textiles, while CIRPASS-2 is testing DPP pilots in textiles, electronics, tyres and construction value chains.

For manufacturers and importers, the main obligation will be to ensure that a compliant DPP exists before placing covered products on the EU market. This requires assigning product identifiers, linking the passport to the product, maintaining required data fields, ensuring data quality and controlling access rights. For distributors and retailers, the DPP may become part of product verification and customer-facing transparency. For suppliers, the key impact will be indirect but significant: they will need to provide reliable material, component and process data to the company responsible for the product passport.

The DPP also creates a new verification problem. Product-level ESG data must be accurate, current and traceable. If recycled content, repairability or carbon data are included in a passport, companies will need evidence behind those claims. This may require supplier declarations, third-party certificates, bills of materials, chain-of-custody records, testing documentation and audit trails.

From a Scope 3 perspective, the DPP is highly relevant. It can support better data for purchased goods and services, product use, waste treatment, circularity metrics and end-of-life emissions. Instead of relying only on spend-based or category-level estimates, companies may gradually gain access to product-specific and component-level data. This can improve carbon accounting, but it also increases compliance exposure if data quality is poor.

The DPP also affects procurement. Buyers will increasingly require suppliers to provide DPP-ready data, including material composition, recycled content, durability information, repair data, and substance declarations. Suppliers that cannot provide structured, verifiable data may become less competitive, especially in regulated product categories.

For software providers, this is a major opportunity. The DPP will require interoperable data systems, product identity management, supplier data portals, lifecycle assessment tools, circularity databases, compliance workflows, API integrations, access-control systems and audit logs. The Commission has also consulted stakeholders on how DPP data should be stored and managed by service providers, including whether certification schemes may be needed for DPP service providers.

Important Deadlines

Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 was adopted on 13 June 2024 and published in the Official Journal on 28 June 2024. The detailed DPP obligations will apply through product-specific delegated acts, meaning deadlines will vary by product group. Batteries already have a related passport system under the EU Battery Regulation, while broader DPP deployment under ESPR will be phased by sector.

Current Status

Active and developing. The legal framework is in force, but many operational details depend on delegated acts, standards, pilots and data-governance rules. CIRPASS and CIRPASS-2 show that the EU is moving from concept to implementation, especially in textiles, electronics, batteries, tyres and construction.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

Enforcement may include blocked market access, product withdrawal, market surveillance action, customs-related controls, corrective action orders, administrative penalties, and reputational risk. Suppliers may face procurement exclusion, reduced supplier ratings or loss of preferred status if they cannot provide reliable product data.

Examples of Known Violations

Likely failure modes include missing product passports, incomplete data fields, inaccurate recycled-content claims, weak material traceability, unsupported carbon footprint data, outdated supplier declarations, poor access-control management, non-interoperable data systems and inability to update product information after design or supplier changes.

Resources


Maílis Carrilho
Added by:
Maílis Carrilho
Sustainability Research Analyst
Maílis Carrilho is a Sustainability Research Analyst (Intern) at Net Zero Compare, contributing research and analysis on climate tech, carbon policies, and sustainable solutions. She supports the team in developing fact-based content and insights to help companies and readers navigate the evolving sustainability landscape.
Our principle

Cut through the green tape

We don't push agendas. At Net Zero Compare, we cut through the hype and fear to deliver the straightforward facts you need for making informed decisions on green products and services. Whether motivated by compliance, customer demands, or a real passion for the environment, you’re welcome here. We provide reliable information. Why you seek it is not our concern.

Added on Jun 22, 2026 by Maílis Carrilho · Updated on Jun 23, 2026