Summary
Details
- Australia
Entities regulated by ASIC or operating in financial markets making ESG-related claims, including fund managers, superannuation trustees, product issuers and listed companies.
Firms that do not market ESG attributes still face risk if sustainability statements appear in annual reports, investor decks or website commitments.
Deep dive
📩 Stay ahead of climate regulation and reporting shifts
Regulatory updates, reporting standards, and new climate software — distilled into one concise weekly brief for decision-makers.
Thanks for signing up. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.
Practical updates. Once per week.
What’s Required
For regulated entities, ESG claims are not mere marketing. They are representations made to investors and consumers and can engage financial services law, disclosure obligations, and misleading conduct prohibitions. REP 791 is particularly relevant because it consolidates ASIC’s observed misconduct patterns and remediation expectations.
The baseline compliance requirement is consistency between:
Product labels and disclosed investment strategy.
Screening statements and actual holdings or selection methodology.
Stewardship claims and real voting/engagement practices.
Net zero targets and operational strategy/capex planning.
REP 791 is designed to highlight good practice examples and recommendations from ASIC surveillance, which regulated firms should translate into internal controls.
Effective compliance programs for greenwashing risk include:
A documented claim approval process involving compliance, legal, investment, and ESG teams.
Evidence packs for each claim (screening criteria, data sources, methodology, governance).
Ongoing monitoring to ensure portfolio drift does not undermine claims.
Incident response for rapid correction if errors are identified.
In financial markets, misstatements can create high-impact regulatory and litigation risk. Boards should require periodic reporting on ESG claim governance, breach incidents, and remediation, and third-party data reliance controls.
Important Deadlines
There is no single statutory date in REP 791 itself, but its scope period is defined: it covers ASIC interventions between 1 April 2023 and 30 June 2024, which matters because it reflects current enforcement posture and near-term supervisory priorities.
Current Status
REP 791 is an official ASIC report released on 23 August 2024 and remains a live compliance benchmark for ESG claims oversight.
Penalties for Non-Compliance
Enforcement can include stop orders, corrective disclosures, infringement action, licence implications, and court proceedings for misleading statements. The practical penalty can be loss of investor confidence and fund flows, as well as remediation costs.
Examples of Known Violations
Common misconduct patterns in ASIC greenwashing surveillance typically include:
Overstating ESG screening or exclusions.
Using ambiguous labels like “sustainable” without defined criteria.
Misrepresenting the use of ESG data or ratings.
Claiming net zero alignment without credible portfolio metrics and pathways.
Inconsistent statements across documents and channels.
Resources
Cut through the green tape
We don't push agendas. At Net Zero Compare, we cut through the hype and fear to deliver the straightforward facts you need for making informed decisions on green products and services. Whether motivated by compliance, customer demands, or a real passion for the environment, you’re welcome here. We provide reliable information. Why you seek it is not our concern.