Net Zero Compare
Australia ASIC Climate Disclosure Compliance

Australia ASIC Climate Disclosure Compliance: ASIC’s expectations for climate risk and sustainability-related disclosure

Maílis Carrilho
Written by Maílis Carrilho
Updated on February 4th, 2026

Summary

ASIC has repeatedly signalled that climate-related risks can be material and therefore require disclosure under existing corporate law disclosure settings, and it provides guidance through its financial reporting and audit focus areas and referenced guidance materials. This creates an enforcement and litigation risk environment where climate-related misstatements, omissions, and inconsistent narratives can trigger regulatory action, especially as mandatory climate reporting phases in.

Details

Jurisdictions
  • Australia
Mandatory for

Mandatory for:

Entities subject to Corporations Act disclosure obligations where climate risk is material; entities raising capital; listed entities under continuous disclosure rules.

Exceptions:

None meaningful where materiality is met. The practical compliance question is determining materiality and maintaining evidence for the conclusion.

Deep dive

3 min read
Updated Feb 4, 2026

📩 Stay ahead of climate regulation and reporting shifts

Regulatory updates, reporting standards, and new climate software — distilled into one concise weekly brief for decision-makers.

Thanks for signing up. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Practical updates. Once per week.


What’s Required

1) Identify material climate risks and reflect them in required reporting components: Treasury’s policy materials explicitly reference ASIC guidance that climate change may need to be disclosed where it represents a material risk, including in the operating and financial review (OFR) as required under the Corporations Act. The compliance requirement is not “mention climate”. It is to ensure the OFR and related disclosures enable a reasonable user to assess business prospects and risks where climate risk is material.

2) Maintain internal controls over climate-related statements across documents: ASIC’s focus materials emphasise disclosure quality and consistency. Compliance should include:

  • a central claim and disclosure register;

  • documented assumptions for transition plans, targets, and scenario outputs;

  • reconciliation across annual report, sustainability report, investor presentations, and website claims;

  • legal review for misleading or deceptive conduct risk.

3) Fundraising and continuous disclosure discipline: For IPOs and capital raisings, material climate risks and assumptions that could affect valuation, cash flows, and asset impairment must be disclosed accurately. For listed entities, continuous disclosure obligations amplify climate risk, especially when climate impacts become more certain (policy changes, physical events, supply disruptions).

4) Prepare for the interaction with mandatory climate reporting: ASIC reports and public materials indicate that climate-related disclosure requirements are expanding, and that listed and unlisted companies will be required to report climate-related disclosures from relevant financial years. Even before an entity is in the first cohort, ASIC expectations about material risk disclosure and greenwashing apply.

5) Evidence and audit readiness: Climate disclosures increasingly resemble financial reporting in the level of evidentiary support expected. Practical controls include:

  • substantiation files for key claims;

  • documented governance sign-offs;

  • external assurance planning where applicable;

  • incident response protocols for correcting errors quickly.

Important Deadlines

  • Regulatory focus cycle: ASIC publishes focus areas and reports, which act as enforcement posture indicators.

  • Mandatory reporting phase-in: the dates depend on legislation and standards, but ASIC materials indicate climate-related reporting will apply from specified financial years, increasing the near-term need for disclosure controls.

Current Status

ASIC maintains active guidance and focus materials for disclosure and financial reporting, and Treasury policy materials explicitly reference ASIC guidance on climate risk disclosure in the OFR when climate risk is material.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

Exposure includes ASIC enforcement for defective or misleading disclosures, corrective disclosure expectations, and civil liability risk (including class action risk) where misstatements are material to investors.

Examples of Known Violations

  1. transition plans presented as funded and executable without credible capex or governance;

  2. claims of “alignment” or “net zero” without scope clarity and credible pathways;

  3. omission of material climate-related impairment risk drivers;

  4. inconsistent emissions or risk narratives across documents;

  5. reliance on third-party ESG data without validation and controls.

Resources


Maílis Carrilho
Added by:
Maílis Carrilho
Sustainability Research Analyst
Maílis Carrilho is a Sustainability Research Analyst (Intern) at Net Zero Compare, contributing research and analysis on climate tech, carbon policies, and sustainable solutions. She supports the team in developing fact-based content and insights to help companies and readers navigate the evolving sustainability landscape.
Our principle

Cut through the green tape

We don't push agendas. At Net Zero Compare, we cut through the hype and fear to deliver the straightforward facts you need for making informed decisions on green products and services. Whether motivated by compliance, customer demands, or a real passion for the environment, you’re welcome here. We provide reliable information. Why you seek it is not our concern.

Added on Feb 3, 2026 by Maílis Carrilho · Updated on Feb 4, 2026