Net Zero Compare
Switzerland Federal Act on Public Procurement

Switzerland Federal Act on Public Procurement: Swiss Public Procurement Act: Sustainability and Life-Cycle Criteria in Tenders

Maílis Carrilho
Written by Maílis Carrilho
Updated on June 3rd, 2026

Summary

Switzerland’s Public Procurement Act embeds sustainability into public spending by requiring procurement to be economically, ecologically, and socially sustainable. This supports environmental and social award criteria, life-cycle costing, and more stringent supplier requirements. Compliance risk arises for authorities if criteria are not transparent and consistently applied, and for suppliers if they cannot evidence sustainability claims or meet sustainability-linked performance clauses. For companies selling to public buyers, procurement law becomes a major sustainability compliance gateway, not just a commercial process.

Details

Jurisdictions
  • Switzerland
Mandatory for

Binding for contracting authorities under the Act; suppliers must comply with tender requirements and contract clauses once awarded.

Exemptions

Scope depends on procurement type, thresholds, and whether a tender is covered by the Act and applicable implementing rules.

Sustainability criteria must remain consistent with procurement law principles (for example transparency and equal treatment).

Deep dive

1 min read
Updated Jun 3, 2026

📩 Stay ahead of climate regulation and reporting shifts

Regulatory updates, reporting standards, and new climate software — distilled into one concise weekly brief for decision-makers.

Thanks for signing up. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Practical updates. Once per week.


What’s Required

Switzerland’s Public Procurement Act requires public spending to be economically, ecologically, and socially sustainable, shifting procurement from lowest-price to best overall value. Key requirements include:

  • Procurement must ensure cost-efficient use of public funds in an economically, ecologically, and socially sustainable manner.

  • Authorities can integrate environmental and social criteria and life-cycle considerations into award criteria and specifications (practice and guidance).

Important Deadlines

  • Continuous: applies across procurement cycles once in force (revised regime is now the baseline).

Current Status

In force and increasingly used to justify sustainability criteria and life-cycle costing approaches.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

  • For authorities: award decisions can be challenged, annulled, or require re-tendering.

  • For suppliers: exclusion from procedure, contract termination, damages, or performance remedies depending on the contract and tender rules.

Examples of Known Violations

  • Sustainability criteria are applied inconsistently or without transparency, leading to challenges.

  • Suppliers failing to meet sustainability-related contract requirements (for example, delivery or documentation clauses), triggering remedies or exclusion.

Resources


Maílis Carrilho
Added by:
Maílis Carrilho
Sustainability Research Analyst
Maílis Carrilho is a Sustainability Research Analyst (Intern) at Net Zero Compare, contributing research and analysis on climate tech, carbon policies, and sustainable solutions. She supports the team in developing fact-based content and insights to help companies and readers navigate the evolving sustainability landscape.
Our principle

Cut through the green tape

We don't push agendas. At Net Zero Compare, we cut through the hype and fear to deliver the straightforward facts you need for making informed decisions on green products and services. Whether motivated by compliance, customer demands, or a real passion for the environment, you’re welcome here. We provide reliable information. Why you seek it is not our concern.

Added on Jun 2, 2026 by Maílis Carrilho · Updated on Jun 3, 2026