Net Zero Compare
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for Packaging in the United States: State-by-State Comparison

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for Packaging in the United States: State-by-State Comparison: Packaging EPR in the United States: How Seven States Are Reshaping Producer Responsibility

Maílis Carrilho
Written by Maílis Carrilho
Updated on December 2nd, 2025

Summary

Packaging EPR in the United States is developing through state-level laws, not federal regulation. Seven states—Maine, Oregon, Colorado, California, Minnesota, Maryland, and Washington- have enacted comprehensive EPR frameworks that require producers to register, join a PRO, report packaging data, and pay eco-fees that fund recycling and system improvements. Some states also impose recyclability, compostability, source reduction, and recycling-rate targets, with key milestones between 2025 and 2032. Small producers may qualify for de minimis exemptions. Because each state designs its own system, companies operating nationally must navigate a complex and evolving patchwork of requirements, deadlines, and fee structures.

Details

Jurisdictions
  • The United States of America (USA)
Exemptions

Packaging EPR obligations are legally binding only in states that have enacted EPR statutes.

Criteria:

Register with the state program or its designated PRO.

Join a PRO or submit an approved individual compliance plan.

Report packaging data annually.

Pay eco-modulated fees that fund recycling and system improvements.

Meet design, recyclability and performance requirements where imposed.

Companies selling nationally may face overlapping and differing obligations depending on where products are sold.

Exceptions:

Common exceptions across states include:

De minimis thresholds, exempting very small producers with low revenue or low packaging volumes.

Limited exemptions where packaging types are already regulated under other stewardship laws.

Exclusion of products not sold into the specific state market, such as exports or out-of-state sales.

Temporary exemptions during early implementation phases or for small producers adapting to new systems.

Exact thresholds vary by state.

Deep dive

3 min read
Updated Dec 2, 2025

📩 Stay ahead of climate regulation and reporting shifts

Regulatory updates, reporting standards, and new climate software — distilled into one concise weekly brief for decision-makers.

Thanks for signing up. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Practical updates. Once per week.


What’s Required

The United States has no federal EPR law for packaging. Instead, several states have introduced their own frameworks. As of late 2025, seven states have enacted comprehensive packaging EPR legislation: Maine, Oregon, Colorado, California, Minnesota, Maryland, and Washington.

Across these states, producers that sell packaged products into the jurisdiction must typically:

  • Register as producers and join a Producer Responsibility Organization (PRO) or file an individual compliance plan.

  • Report annual packaging data, including materials, weights, and recyclability characteristics.

  • Pay eco-fees to fund recycling, collection, processing, infrastructure upgrades, and education efforts.

  • Meet design-for-recycling and performance requirements, which may include recyclability, compostability, source reduction, or minimum recycling-rate targets.

Each state defines its own thresholds, scope of materials, and fee structures.

Important Deadlines

Maine:

  • Program development is ongoing; producer reporting and fee obligations begin gradually from 2026.

Oregon:

  • Law effective since 2022; major program changes and PRO-led systems begin in 2025.

Colorado:

  • Registration and system set-up in 2025; producer fees and statewide recycling program launch in 2025–2026.

California (SB 54):

  • Early producer reporting obligations in 2025.

  • By 2032: 100 percent reusable, recyclable, or compostable packaging; significant source reduction and recycling-rate milestones.

Minnesota, Maryland, Washington:

  • Legislation adopted in 2024–2025; phased implementation begins 2025 onward, with full fee and operational obligations late in the decade.

Current Status

  • Seven states have active EPR legislation, all at different stages of rulemaking, program design and producer registration.

  • Maine, Oregon, and Colorado are advancing toward early operational phases in 2025–2026.

  • California’s system is entering its first reporting cycles, with major performance targets for 2032.

  • Minnesota, Maryland, and Washington are developing implementation rules following recently passed laws.

  • Additional states are actively considering EPR proposals, resulting in a rapidly expanding policy landscape.

  • The overall regulatory environment is characterised by a patchwork of state-specific requirements.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

Penalties differ by state but typically include:

  • Administrative fines for failure to register, report, or pay required fees.

  • Suspension of producer eligibility to sell packaged goods into the state.

  • Orders to remedy unpaid contributions or provide missing reports.

  • Possible enforcement actions by state environmental agencies or attorneys general.

As most programs are still in early stages, enforcement is expected to intensify in the coming years.

Examples of Known Violations

  • Since most state programs are in early implementation, publicly documented violations are limited.

  • States have primarily focused on outreach, producer education, and registration reminders.

  • Legal challenges have emerged around program design in at least one state, but not in the form of enforcement against producers.

  • Widespread enforcement is expected once full reporting and fee-payment deadlines begin in 2025–2027.

Resources


Maílis Carrilho
Added by:
Maílis Carrilho
Sustainability Research Analyst
Maílis Carrilho is a Sustainability Research Analyst (Intern) at Net Zero Compare, contributing research and analysis on climate tech, carbon policies, and sustainable solutions. She supports the team in developing fact-based content and insights to help companies and readers navigate the evolving sustainability landscape.
Our principle

Cut through the green tape

We don't push agendas. At Net Zero Compare, we cut through the hype and fear to deliver the straightforward facts you need for making informed decisions on green products and services. Whether motivated by compliance, customer demands, or a real passion for the environment, you’re welcome here. We provide reliable information. Why you seek it is not our concern.

Added on Dec 3, 2025 by Maílis Carrilho · Updated on Dec 2, 2025