Net Zero Compare
Australia Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Act 1989

Australia Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Act 1989: Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Act 1989 imposes licensing, reporting and phase-down obligations

Maílis Carrilho
Written by Maílis Carrilho
Updated on February 26th, 2026

Summary

Australia’s Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Act 1989 establishes a comprehensive regulatory regime controlling the import, manufacture, export, use, and disposal of ozone-depleting substances and synthetic greenhouse gases, including HFCs. The Act is a core climate and chemicals law, directly supporting Australia’s international obligations under the Montreal Protocol and the Kigali Amendment through binding licensing, quota, and reporting requirements.

Details

Jurisdictions
  • Australia
Exemptions

Mandatory for:

Importers, exporters and manufacturers of controlled substances;

Entities involved in regulated handling and destruction activities.

Exceptions:

Very limited and tightly defined, typically for essential uses or specific circumstances, and always subject to permit and reporting conditions.

Deep dive

3 min read
Published Feb 26, 2026

📩 Stay ahead of climate regulation and reporting shifts

Regulatory updates, reporting standards, and new climate software — distilled into one concise weekly brief for decision-makers.

Thanks for signing up. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Practical updates. Once per week.


What’s Required

1) Licensing and quota controls for controlled substances.
Any entity importing, manufacturing or exporting controlled substances such as HFCs, HCFCs and other regulated gases must hold an appropriate licence issued by the Australian Government. For certain substances, annual quotas apply, requiring entities to:

  • apply for and manage quota allocations;

  • track volumes against quota limits;

  • prevent unauthorised imports or exports.
    Quota management is a primary compliance risk, as excess volumes constitute a breach regardless of intent.

2) Phase-down compliance aligned with Kigali obligations.
The Act implements Australia’s HFC phase-down schedule. This creates binding, time-based reductions in the amount of synthetic greenhouse gases that may be imported or manufactured. Businesses must therefore:

  • plan refrigerant and product transitions in advance;

  • redesign equipment and servicing practices;

  • manage legacy systems and refrigerant recovery to avoid illegal use or disposal.

3) Reporting, recordkeeping and audit readiness.
Licence holders must submit periodic reports detailing volumes of controlled substances imported, manufactured, exported, destroyed or used. Compliance requires:

  • accurate tracking systems across supply chains;

  • reconciliation between customs data and internal records;

  • retention of records sufficient for regulator audit and investigation.

4) Controls on handling, recovery and destruction.
The Act and associated regulations impose obligations on recovery, recycling and destruction of refrigerants and other controlled gases. In practice, this requires:

  • use of appropriately authorised technicians and facilities;

  • documentation of recovery and destruction activities;

  • controls to prevent the venting of gases with high global warming potential.

5) Interaction with product design, building services and energy transition.
Chemical compliance under this Act directly affects:

  • HVAC and refrigeration system design;

  • cold-chain logistics;

  • data centres and industrial cooling;

  • transition to lower-GWP alternatives.
    Failure to align chemical compliance with asset lifecycle planning creates stranded-asset and retrofit risk.

Important Deadlines

  • Licensing and quota years: typically aligned to calendar years.

  • Reporting deadlines: defined in licence conditions and regulations.

  • Phase-down milestones: staged reduction steps set by regulation to meet international commitments.
    Deadlines are hard compliance cut-offs; transitional non-compliance is not permitted.

Current Status

The Act is in force and actively administered, with Australia recognised internationally for strong implementation of ozone and synthetic greenhouse gas controls. Phase-down obligations continue to tighten over time.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

  • civil and criminal penalties;

  • seizure of goods;

  • licence suspension or cancellation;

  • reputational exposure through regulator action.
    Because obligations are volume-based, even administrative errors can result in material breaches.

Examples of Known Violations

Common compliance failures include:

  1. importing HFCs without sufficient quota;

  2. misclassification of substances to avoid controls;

  3. inaccurate volume reporting;

  4. inadequate documentation for recovered or destroyed gases;

  5. continued use of phased-down substances in new equipment.

Resources

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C00290
https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/protection/ozone


Maílis Carrilho
Added by:
Maílis Carrilho
Sustainability Research Analyst
Maílis Carrilho is a Sustainability Research Analyst (Intern) at Net Zero Compare, contributing research and analysis on climate tech, carbon policies, and sustainable solutions. She supports the team in developing fact-based content and insights to help companies and readers navigate the evolving sustainability landscape.
Our principle

Cut through the green tape

We don't push agendas. At Net Zero Compare, we cut through the hype and fear to deliver the straightforward facts you need for making informed decisions on green products and services. Whether motivated by compliance, customer demands, or a real passion for the environment, you’re welcome here. We provide reliable information. Why you seek it is not our concern.

Added on Feb 26, 2026 by Maílis Carrilho ·