Net Zero Compare
Australia Nature Repair Act

Australia Nature Repair Act: Australia’s Nature Repair Act establishes a national biodiversity certificate market with integrity rules and registration requirements

Maílis Carrilho
Written by Maílis Carrilho
Updated on June 18th, 2026

Summary

The Nature Repair Act 2023 creates a legislated national framework for a voluntary biodiversity market, enabling the issuance and trade of biodiversity certificates tied to approved nature repair projects. Although participation is voluntary, entities seeking certificates must comply with statutory integrity, transparency, and registration requirements, making the regime relevant for corporates using biodiversity credits for nature-positive claims and supply-chain expectations.

Details

Jurisdictions
  • Australia
Voluntary for

Participation is voluntary, but any entity that chooses to run a nature repair project under the Act or transact and make claims based on statutory nature repair certificates must comply with the Act’s requirements and associated rules.

Exemptions

Practical carve-outs:

Organizations can undertake nature restoration without participating in the statutory market, but cannot legitimately claim statutory certificate attributes without compliance.

For corporates, the key threshold is whether biodiversity credits are used in procurement, claims, disclosures, or financing, where credibility is tested.

Deep dive

3 min read
Updated Jun 18, 2026

📩 Stay ahead of climate regulation and reporting shifts

Regulatory updates, reporting standards, and new climate software — distilled into one concise weekly brief for decision-makers.

Thanks for signing up. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Practical updates. Once per week.


What’s Required

The Act provides the legal basis for a national biodiversity market and certificate framework. For compliance teams, the central question is: if your organisation buys, sells, relies on, or markets “nature repair” outcomes, are you using the statutory market and its certificates, and can you meet integrity requirements?

For project proponents, expected compliance duties include:

  • Project registration under the statutory framework.

  • Evidence and methodology alignment to demonstrate the nature of the repair outcomes claimed.

  • Ongoing monitoring and reporting to support certificate integrity over time.

  • Recordkeeping and auditability for project activities, land management actions, ecological indicators, and any contractual arrangements that affect outcome delivery.

For market participants (buyers, intermediaries, corporates retiring certificates for claims):

  • Control ownership, transfer, and retirement of certificates.

  • Ensure claims match certificate scope and status, and avoid double-counting.

  • Maintain documentation sufficient for scrutiny by regulators, auditors, customers, and civil society stakeholders.

Official program materials emphasise integrity and transparency as scheme objectives, meaning participants should expect rules designed to prevent low-quality credits and to support public confidence.

Important Deadlines

  • Act in force: The Nature Repair Act 2023 is listed as in force on the federal legislation register.

  • Commencement/effect date (program materials): DCCEEW materials state that the Act came into effect on 15 December 2023.

  • Implementation milestones: Entities should track rulemaking, registry functionality, and guidance updates as these will define operational compliance steps and participant requirements over time.

Current Status

The Nature Repair Act 2023 is in force and supported by departmental materials describing the legislative framework and its integrity objectives.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

The practical enforcement levers in legislated environmental markets typically include:

  • Refusal to register projects or issue certificates where requirements are not met.

  • Cancellation or invalidation of certificates in serious integrity breaches.

  • Enforcement for false or misleading statements tied to certificates and market participation (including downstream consumer law and disclosure exposure).

Examples of Known Violations

Common failure modes in biodiversity credit systems include:

  1. Outcome overstatement: Claiming gains not supported by monitoring evidence.

  2. Baseline manipulation: Inflating “improvement” by selecting weak baselines or inappropriate reference conditions.

  3. Permanence and maintenance failures: Not sustaining biodiversity outcomes over required periods.

  4. Double counting: Selling the same outcome multiple times or claiming without retirement.

  5. Governance gaps on land tenure and control: Projects failing where land management rights and responsibilities are unclear.

Resources


Maílis Carrilho
Added by:
Maílis Carrilho
Sustainability Research Analyst
Maílis Carrilho is a Sustainability Research Analyst (Intern) at Net Zero Compare, contributing research and analysis on climate tech, carbon policies, and sustainable solutions. She supports the team in developing fact-based content and insights to help companies and readers navigate the evolving sustainability landscape.
Our principle

Cut through the green tape

We don't push agendas. At Net Zero Compare, we cut through the hype and fear to deliver the straightforward facts you need for making informed decisions on green products and services. Whether motivated by compliance, customer demands, or a real passion for the environment, you’re welcome here. We provide reliable information. Why you seek it is not our concern.

Added on Jun 17, 2026 by Maílis Carrilho · Updated on Jun 18, 2026