Summary
Details
- Australia
All businesses making environmental claims in trade or commerce, regardless of sector or size.
None meaningful. Even “informal” sustainability statements can be captured if they influence consumer decisions or market behaviour.
Deep dive
📩 Stay ahead of climate regulation and reporting shifts
Regulatory updates, reporting standards, and new climate software — distilled into one concise weekly brief for decision-makers.
Thanks for signing up. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.
Practical updates. Once per week.
What’s Required
ACL section 18 prohibits misleading or deceptive conduct in trade or commerce. This applies to sustainability claims across marketing, packaging, websites, investor communications, and product labelling. It is technology-neutral: the same legal test applies to digital ads and “net zero” messaging.
ACCC guidance explains what businesses need to do to comply with ACL when making environmental claims and describes potential enforcement outcomes. Compliance means:
Claims must be specific, accurate, and backed by evidence available at the time the claim is made.
Qualifications and limitations must be clear, prominent, and not contradictory.
Claims about recycled content, offsets, renewable energy, and future transition outcomes must be supported by credible methodology and documentation.
High-performing compliance programs implement a “claims governance” model:
Central approval workflow for environmental claims (legal + sustainability + product/engineering).
A substantiation file for each claim family (scope, methodology, data sources, validity period, sign-off).
Change control when suppliers, materials, or processes change.
Training for marketing and sales teams.
Monitoring of third-party certification usage and label conditions.
Under ACCC guidance, risk is elevated for:
Broad claims like “eco-friendly”, “green”, “carbon neutral”, “net zero”, “100% recyclable”.
Claims that rely on offsets, future technology, or aspirational targets.
Claims about “ocean plastic” or highly emotive environmental attributes, where sourcing definitions are often misunderstood.
Important Deadlines
ACL obligations are continuous and apply immediately. The operational “deadlines” are internal: pre-launch review gates, campaign refresh cycles, supplier-change triggers, and incident response timeframes when a claim is challenged.
Current Status
The ACL is in force through the Competition and Consumer Act framework, and ACCC guidance on environmental claims is published and intended to shape compliance expectations and enforcement approach.
Penalties for Non-Compliance
Breaches can result in regulatory action, court proceedings, penalties, corrective notices, and compliance program orders. ACCC guidance outlines potential enforcement outcomes.
Examples of Known Violations
Common failure modes include:
Claiming recycled content without supplier certificates, test results, or traceable evidence.
Using “carbon neutral” language without a clear scope, boundary, and offset retirement evidence.
Presenting future transition aspirations as if already achieved.
Hiding key qualifications in fine print or inaccessible links.
Reusing outdated substantiation after product changes.
Resources
Cut through the green tape
We don't push agendas. At Net Zero Compare, we cut through the hype and fear to deliver the straightforward facts you need for making informed decisions on green products and services. Whether motivated by compliance, customer demands, or a real passion for the environment, you’re welcome here. We provide reliable information. Why you seek it is not our concern.