Summary
Details
- Global
Requirements apply primarily to strategic and high-impact suppliers, though baseline environmental expectations extend across the supplier base. The intensity of engagement and reporting varies depending on supplier size, role and emissions profile.
Deep dive
📩 Stay ahead of climate regulation and reporting shifts
Regulatory updates, reporting standards, and new climate software — distilled into one concise weekly brief for decision-makers.
Thanks for signing up. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.
Practical updates. Once per week.
What’s Required
Adidas’ framework is characterized by its integration of capability-building with structured emissions management. Unlike purely compliance-driven systems, adidas requires suppliers to actively develop the technical and organizational capacity to measure, manage, and reduce environmental impacts. This begins with emissions accounting.
Suppliers are expected to quantify Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and, where relevant, key Scope 3 categories associated with manufacturing processes, energy use, and upstream inputs. This requirement implies the use of standardized carbon accounting methodologies and the establishment of internal data systems capable of tracking emissions across facilities and production lines.
Training is a core component of the framework. Adidas provides suppliers with technical guidance to identify emissions sources, calculate footprints and develop reduction strategies. This transforms the framework into a hybrid governance model combining compliance obligations with structured capacity-building. Suppliers are not only evaluated on current performance but also on their ability to improve over time.
A central requirement is the development of decarbonisation roadmaps. Suppliers must identify emissions reduction opportunities, prioritize interventions, and define implementation pathways. These roadmaps typically include measures such as energy efficiency improvements, transition to renewable energy, process optimization, and waste reduction. The roadmap requirement introduces a forward-looking governance dimension, requiring suppliers to demonstrate planning capability and strategic alignment with climate goals.
Environmental performance is monitored through structured data collection and evaluation processes. Adidas integrates supplier environmental metrics into broader supplier management systems, meaning that emissions performance, waste management, and chemical compliance influence supplier evaluation and potentially procurement decisions.
The framework also incorporates multiple environmental dimensions beyond carbon. Suppliers must manage waste streams, including targets related to landfill diversion, and comply with chemical management requirements. This multi-dimensional approach reflects the complexity of apparel supply chains, where environmental impacts are distributed across energy use, materials, water, and chemical processes.
Another key feature is segmentation. Adidas applies more intensive requirements to strategic and high-impact suppliers, particularly those with significant emissions or environmental risk. This allows the company to focus resources on areas with the greatest potential impact while maintaining baseline expectations across the broader supplier base.
The framework is iterative. Suppliers are expected to improve over time, with performance monitored across multiple cycles. This creates a dynamic compliance environment where continuous improvement is required, rather than one-time certification.
Important Deadlines
Adidas aligns supplier expectations with its corporate climate targets, including 2030 emissions reduction milestones. Suppliers are expected to develop and implement decarbonisation roadmaps within this timeframe, with ongoing monitoring and periodic updates.
Current Status
The program is active and expanding. Adidas continues to scale supplier engagement, training, and emissions tracking across its global supply chain.
Penalties for Non-Compliance
Non-compliance affects supplier evaluation and may result in reduced business opportunities, increased scrutiny or exclusion from strategic supplier programs. Enforcement is primarily procurement-based.
Examples of Known Violations
Common failure modes include incomplete emissions inventories, lack of credible decarbonisation roadmaps, weak implementation of reduction measures, and inadequate chemical or waste management practices.
Resources
Cut through the green tape
We don't push agendas. At Net Zero Compare, we cut through the hype and fear to deliver the straightforward facts you need for making informed decisions on green products and services. Whether motivated by compliance, customer demands, or a real passion for the environment, you’re welcome here. We provide reliable information. Why you seek it is not our concern.