Net Zero Compare

Heightened Scrutiny and Measurable Outcomes Shape Sustainability Agenda at Trellis GreenBiz 26

Maílis Carrilho
Written by Maílis Carrilho
Updated on April 16th, 2026
5 min read
Published Apr 16, 2026

The sustainability landscape is entering a more demanding phase, marked by heightened scrutiny, stricter expectations, and a growing emphasis on measurable impact. This was a central theme at Trellis GreenBiz 26, an industry event organized by GreenBiz Group under its rebranded platform Trellis, where corporate leaders, policymakers, and sustainability practitioners gathered to assess the state of the Corporate Sustainability Enters an Era of Accountability and Data-Driven Action transition.

Across panels and discussions, a consistent message emerged: the era of broad climate commitments is giving way to a period defined by execution, verification, and accountability. Companies are increasingly expected to demonstrate not only ambition but also credible progress supported by data, governance structures, and transparent reporting.

From Commitments to Credibility

Over the past decade, many organizations have set net-zero targets, often aligned with global frameworks such as the Paris Agreement. However, participants at the event noted that stakeholders, including investors, regulators, and civil society, are now scrutinizing the credibility of these commitments more closely.

This shift is being driven in part by regulatory developments, particularly in major markets such as the European Union and the United States. New disclosure requirements and evolving standards are pushing companies to provide more detailed information on emissions, transition plans, and climate-related risks. As a result, sustainability strategies must now withstand external validation and align with recognized methodologies.

Speakers emphasized that credibility hinges on clear interim targets, capital allocation aligned with decarbonization pathways, and robust tracking mechanisms. Without these elements, net-zero pledges risk being perceived as insufficient or misleading.

The Role of Data and Digital Infrastructure

Another key takeaway from the event was the growing importance of data systems and digital tools in supporting sustainability efforts. As organizations face increasing pressure to report accurate and granular emissions data, many are investing in advanced platforms to manage, analyze, and disclose environmental performance.

The integration of sustainability data into core business systems is becoming essential. This includes linking emissions data with financial reporting, supply chain management, and operational metrics. Such integration enables companies to identify inefficiencies, prioritize interventions, and track progress in real time.

Participants also highlighted the challenges associated with data quality and consistency, particularly in Scope 3 emissions, which often rely on estimates and third-party inputs. Improving data transparency across value chains remains a critical priority, requiring collaboration between companies, suppliers, and technology providers.

Supply Chains Under the Spotlight

Supply chain emissions and practices were another focal point of discussion. With Scope 3 emissions often accounting for the majority of a company’s carbon footprint, there is growing pressure to engage suppliers in decarbonization efforts.

At Trellis GreenBiz 26, experts noted that leading companies are moving beyond basic supplier codes of conduct toward more structured engagement strategies. These include setting supplier-specific targets, providing technical support, and incorporating sustainability criteria into procurement decisions.

However, challenges persist, particularly for smaller suppliers with limited resources or technical capacity. Addressing these barriers will require coordinated efforts across industries, including shared standards, financing mechanisms, and capacity-building initiatives.

Balancing Short-Term Pressures and Long-Term Goals

Economic uncertainty and shifting political dynamics are adding complexity to corporate sustainability efforts. Some companies are facing pressure to prioritize short-term financial performance, which can conflict with long-term climate investments.

Despite these challenges, many speakers argued that sustainability remains a strategic imperative. Climate risks, regulatory requirements, and market expectations continue to evolve, making it increasingly difficult for companies to delay action without facing reputational or financial consequences.

The discussion also touched on the need for resilience and adaptability in sustainability strategies. Companies must be prepared to adjust their approaches in response to new information, technologies, and policy developments, while maintaining a clear long-term vision.

Nature, Biodiversity, and Broader ESG Integration

In addition to climate change, the event highlighted growing attention to nature and biodiversity. Companies are beginning to recognize the interconnectedness of environmental issues and the need for integrated approaches that address multiple dimensions of sustainability.

This includes assessing dependencies and impacts on natural ecosystems, as well as aligning corporate strategies with emerging frameworks such as the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures. While still in early stages, this area is expected to gain importance as stakeholders demand more comprehensive environmental reporting.

At the same time, broader ESG considerations, including social equity and governance, remain integral to sustainability strategies. Ensuring a just transition, addressing workforce impacts, and maintaining strong governance practices are seen as essential components of credible climate action.

Implications for Businesses and Stakeholders

The insights from Trellis GreenBiz 26 underscore a fundamental shift in the sustainability landscape. Companies are no longer evaluated solely on their commitments but on their ability to deliver measurable results.

For businesses, this means strengthening internal capabilities, investing in data infrastructure, and aligning sustainability with core business strategy. It also requires greater transparency and engagement with stakeholders, including investors, regulators, and customers.

For policymakers and standard-setting bodies, the challenge lies in creating clear and consistent frameworks that support comparability and accountability while enabling innovation.

Ultimately, the transition to a low-carbon economy is entering a more mature phase, characterized by increased scrutiny and higher expectations. Organizations that can demonstrate credible progress and adapt to evolving demands are likely to be better positioned in this new environment.

Source: www.esgdive.com


Maílis Carrilho
Written by:
Maílis Carrilho
Sustainability Research Analyst
Maílis Carrilho is a Sustainability Research Analyst (Intern) at Net Zero Compare, contributing research and analysis on climate tech, carbon policies, and sustainable solutions. She supports the team in developing fact-based content and insights to help companies and readers navigate the evolving sustainability landscape.
Our principle

Cut through the green tape

We don't push agendas. At Net Zero Compare, we cut through the hype and fear to deliver the straightforward facts you need for making informed decisions on green products and services. Whether motivated by compliance, customer demands, or a real passion for the environment, you’re welcome here. We provide reliable information. Why you seek it is not our concern.